-----------------------------------

vvlad

17 Feb 2009 13:36



-----------------------------------

" E in schimb indoctrinat religios. Ar fi trebuit sa-ti dea imediat de gandit faptul ca sustine ca la baza teoriei Big Bang sta ... Charle Darwin" 

Nu am remarcat acest aspect, in schimb, acum am citit descrierea filmului ca sa vad daca asa este si am gasit o fraza care cam contrazice ce ati spus dvs mai sus, spunand ca dimpotriva, nu el este indoctrinat religios, ci cei care au venit cu treoria Big Bang:
" The Big Bangers, however, resort to the same arguments offered for the existence of God. All big bangers start with the premise that the big bang is fact. It just is. And then go from there. The big bang was in fact proposed by a Catholic priest. The big bang is religion masquerading as science, its the story of Genesis masquerading as science. The big bang is a myth. The universe is eternal, ageless, and has no beginning and no end....The purpose of this video is to topple and shatter the idols worshipped by those who use the language of science to promote a religious myth, i.e. that the universe had a beginning and was created.
...That is, there was a big bang, but this was not THE BIG BANG, but just one of many that occur here, there, there, there... Like drops of rain hitting far apart on a vast, eternal cosmic ocean creating circles of ripples that are so far apart they may seem to never to interact. (but they do)."

Scuze ca nu am acum timp sa traduc.
Ceea ce am inteles eu e ca vrea sa spuna ca universul nu are un inceput (the big bang) ci este infinit ca timp si spatiu existand din totdeauna si pentru totdeauna, big bangurile fiind evenimente locale, ici sau colo, acum, mai demult sau mai tarziu, in acest Univers.

Din comentariul dvs, sa inteleg ca nu este plauzibil? Daca aceasta teorie ar fi adevarata ar contrazice acele fapte constatate observational pe care le-ati mentionat?